From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Aurora v. Grimm Construction Company, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 27, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02371-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-02371-PAB-BNB.

January 27, 2010


ORDER


This matter arises on Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendants' Motion to Compel Supplemental Document Production [Doc. # 124, filed 1/6/2010] (the "Motion to Compel"). I held a hearing on the Motion to Compel this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:

GRANTED to require the defendants to produce, on or before February 15, 2010, all documents in their possession, custody, and control, not previously produced, that comprise the file history in U.S. Patent Application No. 10/704, 347. The materials may be produced subject to the protective order in place in this case and designated for attorney eyes only, and may further limit disclosure to exclude plaintiff's counsel Steve Sims; and

DENIED in all other respects.


Summaries of

City of Aurora v. Grimm Construction Company, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 27, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02371-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2010)
Case details for

City of Aurora v. Grimm Construction Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, a municipal corporation, acting by and through…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 27, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-02371-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2010)