From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Atl. City v. Young

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 10, 1901
49 A. 1135 (Ch. Div. 1901)

Opinion

07-10-1901

CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY v. YOUNG McSHEA AMUSEMENT CO.

Godfrey & Godfrey, for complainant. Allen B. Endicott, for defendant.


Godfrey & Godfrey, for complainant.

Allen B. Endicott, for defendant.

REED, V. C. All the points raised by the defendants in this ease were considered in the case of City of Atlantic City v. Atlantic City Steel-Pier Co., 49 Atl. 822; both cases being tried together by consent. I will advise a decree for the complainant.


Summaries of

City of Atl. City v. Young

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 10, 1901
49 A. 1135 (Ch. Div. 1901)
Case details for

City of Atl. City v. Young

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY v. YOUNG McSHEA AMUSEMENT CO.

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jul 10, 1901

Citations

49 A. 1135 (Ch. Div. 1901)

Citing Cases

White v. Young's Pier & Hotel Co.

their property and connecting the same to the new walk about to be erected, and upon the further condition…

McAllister v. H.J. Heinz Co.

This court held that neither the internal alteration of an existing structure thereon and its subdivision…