From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Ardmore v. Fraley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 19, 1916
162 P. 684 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 8358

Opinion Filed December 19, 1916. Rehearing Denied January 30, 1917.

Municipal Corporations — Assessments for Street Improvement — Injunction.

Reversed on authority of the City of Ardmore et al. v. Appollos et al., 62 Okla. 232, 162 P. 211.

(Syllabus by Rummons, C.)

Error from District Court, Carter County; W.F. Freeman, Judge.

Proceeding against the City of Ardmore, Okla., L.V. Mullen, Mayor, and others, by C.E. Fraley and others. Judgment for Fraley and others, and the City and others bring error. Reversed, with instructions.

Wm. G. Davisson, Russell Brown, and Tibbetts Green, for plaintiffs in error.

G.A. Paul and Harold Lee, for defendants in error.


The facts and the relief prayed for in this cause are identical with the City of Ardmore et al. v. Appollos et al., 62 Okla. 232, 162 P. 211. The causes were submitted together in this court and orally argued as one cause. Upon the authority of the City of Ardmore et al. v. Appollos, supra, the judgment of the trial court in the instant case is reversed, with instructions to proceed in conformity with the views expressed in the case of the City of Ardmore et al. v. Appollos et al., supra.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

City of Ardmore v. Fraley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 19, 1916
162 P. 684 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

City of Ardmore v. Fraley

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF ARDMORE et al. v. FRALEY et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 19, 1916

Citations

162 P. 684 (Okla. 1916)
65 Okla. 14

Citing Cases

City of Enid ex rel. Versluis v. Robinson

or in part, for any reason whatever, the governing body may at any time in such manner provided for levying…