From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Honolulu v. Bonded Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Mar 29, 1973
507 P.2d 1084 (Haw. 1973)

Opinion

No. 5243

March 29, 1973

ABE, ACTING C.J., LEVINSON AND KOBAYASHI, JJ., AND CIRCUIT JUDGE MENOR IN PLACE OF RICHARDSON, C.J., DISQUALIFIED, AND CIRCUIT JUDGE LANHAM IN PLACE OF MARUMOTO, J., DISQUALIFIED

Daniel H. Case and Ted Gamble Clause ( Case, Stack, Kay, Cronin Clause of counsel), attorneys for the petition.


The petition for leave to file petition for rehearing as amicus curiae is denied without argument. Circuit Judge Lanham, who dissented, does not concur.


Summaries of

City of Honolulu v. Bonded Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Mar 29, 1973
507 P.2d 1084 (Haw. 1973)
Case details for

City of Honolulu v. Bonded Investment Co.

Case Details

Full title:CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Mar 29, 1973

Citations

507 P.2d 1084 (Haw. 1973)
507 P.2d 1084