From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citron v. Kapner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1947
271 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

January 27, 1947.


Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff wife as the result of the alleged common-law negligence of defendant, and by her husband for expenses and loss of consortium. The oven door of a gas range in an apartment rented by plaintiffs from defendant had been placed in such proximity to the framework of a window that the door could not be fully opened and, while in use, the door slammed shut on the hand and arm of plaintiff wife, causing burns and other injuries. Judgment for defendant dismissing the complaint on the merits, in accordance with the granting of motion of defendant at the close of plaintiffs' case, reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. It was error for the trial court to refuse to permit plaintiffs to introduce proof of subsequent repair, for such proof would serve to create an issue of fact with respect to control. ( Scudero v. Campbell, 288 N.Y. 328; Antonsen v. Bay Ridge Savings Bank, 292 N.Y. 143.) Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston and Nolan, JJ., concur; Aldrich, J., deceased.


Summaries of

Citron v. Kapner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1947
271 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Citron v. Kapner

Case Details

Full title:REGINA CITRON et al., Appellants, v. OSCAR KAPNER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1947

Citations

271 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Reische v. Montgomery

It was error to dismiss the complaint, as the proof of repairs created an issue of fact as to whether there…

Miller v. Morse

In fact, repairs made prior to the accident bear more directly upon the question of whether the landlord was…