From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citizens United to Protect Our Neighborhoods v. Vill. of Chestnut Ridge

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 30, 2022
19 CIVIL 3461 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2022)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 3461 (NSR)

09-30-2022

CITIZENS UNITED TO PROTECT OUR NEIGHBORHOODS; HILDA KOGUT; ROBERT ASSELBERGS; and CAROLE GOODMAN, Plaintiffs, v. VILLAGE OF CHESTNUT RIDGE, NEW YORK, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated September 30, 2022, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Proposed Intervenors' Motion to Intervene is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Second Circuit has made clear that "where a case is dismissed for lack of Article III standing, as here, that disposition cannot be entered with prejudice, and instead must be dismissed without prejudice." Katz v. Donna Karan Co., L.L.C., 872 F.3d 114, 121 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis in original). Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Village of Chestnut Ridge, New York, without prejudice.


Summaries of

Citizens United to Protect Our Neighborhoods v. Vill. of Chestnut Ridge

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 30, 2022
19 CIVIL 3461 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Citizens United to Protect Our Neighborhoods v. Vill. of Chestnut Ridge

Case Details

Full title:CITIZENS UNITED TO PROTECT OUR NEIGHBORHOODS; HILDA KOGUT; ROBERT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

Citations

19 CIVIL 3461 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2022)