From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citizen Ctr. v. Gessler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00370-CMA-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00370-CMA-MJW

07-13-2012

CITIZEN CENTER, Plaintiff(s), v. SCOTT GESSLER, SHEILA REINER, SCOTT DOYLE, PAM ANDERSON, HILLARY HALL, JOYCE RENO, and TEAK SIMONTON, Defendant(s).

Robert A. McGuire, III Maurice G. Knaizer LeeAnn Morrill David R. Frankel David P. Ayraud Linda K. Connors Write Mott David E. Hughes Gillian Dale Thomas J. Lyons Bryan R. Treu


Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe


FTR - Courtroom A-502

Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller

Counsel

Robert A. McGuire, III

Maurice G. Knaizer

LeeAnn Morrill

David R. Frankel

David P. Ayraud

Linda K. Connors

Write Mott

David E. Hughes

Gillian Dale

Thomas J. Lyons

Bryan R. Treu

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: MOTION HEARING / ORAL ARGUMENT

Court in Session: 10:00 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

The Court raises Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Magistrate's Reconsideration and Stay Pending Reconsideration of Part of the Court's June 4 Scheduling Order [Docket No. 46, filed June 08, 2012] for argument.

Argument on behalf of plaintiff by Robert A. McGuire, III.

Responsive argument on behalf of counties in this lawsuit by Gillian Dale.

Responsive argument on behalf of Secretary of State by LeeAnn Morrill.

Rebuttal by Robert A. McGuire, III.

Defendant tenders Exhibit A to the Court.

Plaintiff tenders Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 to the Court.

These exhibits are reviewed by the Court for the purpose of this hearing only.

It is ORDERED: Plaintiff's EMERGENCY MOTION FOR MAGISTRATE'S RECONSIDERATION AND STAY PENDING RECONSIDERATION OF PART OF THE COURT'S JUNE 4 SCHEDULING ORDER [Docket No. 46, filed June 08, 2012] is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. The court will issue its written Order.

Plaintiff orally reiterates its Motion to Stay during the pendency of the Court's consideration of the Motion. The Court anticipates issuing its ruling on the motion no later than July 16, 2012, and thus the request to stay is denied.

Plaintiff is directed to provide by e-mail to the defendants at least a preliminary list of the topics expected to be raised in the Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) depositions. Defendants are directed to review the outline and start determining who might be deposed.

HEARING CONCLUDES.

Court in recess: 12:03 p.m.

Total In-Court Time: 02:03

To order a transcript of this proceedings, contact Avery Wood Reports (303) 825-6119 or Toll Free 1-800-962-3345.


Summaries of

Citizen Ctr. v. Gessler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00370-CMA-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Citizen Ctr. v. Gessler

Case Details

Full title:CITIZEN CENTER, Plaintiff(s), v. SCOTT GESSLER, SHEILA REINER, SCOTT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00370-CMA-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 13, 2012)