Opinion
No. 20120208.
2012-10-23
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee v. Delbert L. ADOLPH Jr.; Katherine L. Adolph; and any person in possession, Defendants Delbert L. Adolph Jr.; Katherine L. Adolph, Appellants.
Appeal from the District Court of Traill County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge. Mark C. Sherer, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief. Delbert L. Adolph, self-represented, and Katherine L. Adolph, self-represented, Portland, ND, appellants; on brief.
Appeal from the District Court of Traill County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
Mark C. Sherer, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief. Delbert L. Adolph, self-represented, and Katherine L. Adolph, self-represented, Portland, ND, appellants; on brief.
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] Delbert and Katherine Adolph appealed from a district court order granting foreclosure on their mortgaged property. On appeal, the Adolphs argue CitiMortgage was required to produce the original promissory note, CitiMortgage was not a proper holder of the note, and their right to due process was violated. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7); seeN.D.R.Ev. 1003 (stating a duplicate may be used to the same extent as the original unless a genuine issue is raised as to the authenticity or effectiveness of the original); Robertson v. Brown, 75 N.D. 109, 114, 25 N.W.2d 781, 784–85 (1947) (stating “[t]he transfer of a promissory note carries with it the mortgage securing the note though no valid assignment of the mortgage is executed and delivered .”). [¶ 2]