From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank v. Horoshko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 30, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (O'Donoghue, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs to the appellants.

The plaintiff made an ex parte application for expedient service pursuant to CPLR 308 (5). In an order dated February 15, 1996, the Supreme Court, Queens County, granted the application and permitted service upon the appellants by publication. Following service by publication, the appellants made a motion, inter alia, to vacate the February 15, 1996, order. The order on appeal denied the appellants' motion. After the appellants perfected this appeal, the plaintiff voluntarily made its own motion to vacate the February 15, 1996, order. In an order dated September 1, 1998, the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), granted the plaintiff's motion, and dismissed the complaint as against the appellants. Thus, since the subject matter of the appellants' appeal is no longer at issue, the appeal is academic. However, the appellants should be awarded the costs of the instant appeal since the plaintiff did not make its motion to vacate until after the instant appeal was perfected.

Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Citibank v. Horoshko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Citibank v. Horoshko

Case Details

Full title:CITIBANK, N. A., Respondent, v. ROGER HOROSHKO et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

Arthur v. Energy

In addition, courts have long resorted to publication of the summons in a newspaper as a means of alternate…