From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank v. Baronat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 14, 1997


In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Roger Baronat and Valerie Baronat appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated March 19, 1996, which, inter alia, denied their motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Based upon the Supreme Court's determination on issues of credibility, which is entitled to substantial deference on appeal ( see, McCray v. Petrini, 212 A.D.2d 676), the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over the appellants pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) ( see, Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Arrao, 100 A.D.2d 949). Rosenblatt, J.P., Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Citibank v. Baronat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Citibank v. Baronat

Case Details

Full title:CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent, v. PILAR M. BARONAT et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Norwest Mortgage v. Diaz

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The determination of the Supreme Court as to the credibility…

Federal National Mortgage Association v. Roth

The Supreme Court's determination as to credibility at the hearing to determine whether the defendants had…