From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank, South Dakota v. Schweitzer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Feb 18, 1997
941 S.W.2d 655 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 70857

OPINION FILED: February 18, 1997 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 31, 1997. Application to Transfer Denied April 29, 1997.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS HON. GEORGE W. DRAPER, III.

William O. Schweitzer, party acting pro se.

Jeffrey T. Weisman, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ.



ORDER


Appellant, William O. Schweitzer, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his motion to quash service of process. We affirm.

We have reviewed appellant's brief and the legal file and find the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Citibank, South Dakota v. Schweitzer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Feb 18, 1997
941 S.W.2d 655 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Citibank, South Dakota v. Schweitzer

Case Details

Full title:CITIBANK, SOUTH DAKOTA, Respondent, v. WILLIAM O. SCHWEITZER, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Feb 18, 1997

Citations

941 S.W.2d 655 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Citibank, South Dakota v. Schweitzer

Appellant, William O. Schweitzer, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 74.05 motion to set aside…