From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 26, 2000
276 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

October 26, 2000.

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Madison County (O'Brien III, J.), dated June 18, 1999, which imposed sanctions on defendant's counsel.

Daly, Cilingiryan, Murphy, Sinnott Capoccia LLC (Charles G. Fiore of Lewis Fiore, New York City, of counsel), Albany, for appellant.

Solomon Solomon P.C. (Douglas M. Fisher of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


In this consumer debt collection action, plaintiff moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. On behalf of defendant, its client, Andrew F. Capoccia Law Centers L.L.C. (hereinafter Capoccia) opposed the motion, asserting that plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to summary judgment, and cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In an affidavit opposing the cross motion, plaintiff sought the imposition of sanctions against Capoccia. Supreme Court issued a decision granting plaintiff's motion, imposing sanctions against Capoccia in the amount of $500 and directing plaintiff's counsel to submit an order. Before an order or judgment on the decision was signed or entered, defendant apparently filed for bankruptcy. As plaintiff concluded that the automatic stay of collection efforts against defendant attendant to the filing of a bankruptcy petition (see, 11 U.S.C. § 362) prevented the entry of an order of sanctions against Capoccia, it appears that plaintiff has not pursued such an order. Nevertheless, Capoccia purports to appeal from so much of Supreme Court's decision that imposed sanctions.

As Supreme Court's decision imposing sanctions has not yet been reduced to an order, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the issues raised in the briefs of the parties and the appeal must be dismissed (see, CPLR 5512 [a]; O'Fennell Corp. v. O'Fennell's of Pine Hill, 188 A.D.2d 981; Burometto v. Town of Schodack, 85 A.D.2d 805, appeal dismissed 55 N.Y.2d 1036).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.


Summaries of

Citibank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 26, 2000
276 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Citibank

Case Details

Full title:CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., Respondent, v. ELLEN MORRISSEY, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 26, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 610

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Graziano v. County of Albany

Supreme Court awarded petitioner counsel fees in the underlying proceeding ( see Public Officers Law § 18…

Hammerstein v. Henry Mountain Corp.

Apparently, the property was sold at auction for well above the amount due on the mortgage, and money has…