From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Gurule

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 13, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-01124-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-01124-KJD-PAL.

October 13, 2011


ORDER


Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#9). Though the time for doing so has passed, Defendant has failed to file a response in opposition. Therefore, in accordance with Local Rule 7-2(d), and good cause being found, the Court grants the motion. Having read and considered the Complaint (#1), no federal cause of action is found in the allegations of the Complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#9) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Gurule

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 13, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-01124-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Gurule

Case Details

Full title:CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Plaintiff, v. ERICK A. GURULE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-01124-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2011)