From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CITARELLA v. LARO MAINTENANCE CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 1999
258 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 25, 1999

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from, an order denying reargument.

The plaintiff's in this slip and fall case did not offer a valid excuse for their failure to offer the testimony of a co-worker of the injured plaintiff when the defendant's motion for summary judgment was submitted. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' motion, which was denominated as one for renewal, was, in fact, one for reargument, the denial of which is not appealable ( see, McNeil v. Wagner Coll., 246 A.D.2d 516; King v. Rockaway One Co., 202 A.D.2d 395; Chiarella v. Quitoni, 178 A.D.2d 502).

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

CITARELLA v. LARO MAINTENANCE CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 1999
258 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

CITARELLA v. LARO MAINTENANCE CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN CITARELLA et al., Appellants, v. LARO MAINTENANCE CORPORATION, a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 25, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 756