From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citak v. Visitación-Lewis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 22, 2016
145 A.D.3d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-22-2016

In re Donald L. CITAK, et al., Petitioners, v. Hon. Laura VISITACIÓN–LEWIS, etc., Respondent.

Peter Wessel, New York, for petitioners. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jonathan D. Conley of counsel), for respondent.


Peter Wessel, New York, for petitioners.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jonathan D. Conley of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioners having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is granted to the extent of directing that the underlying matter be transferred randomly to another Justice, without costs or disbursements.

ANDRIAS, J.P., SAXE, FEINMAN, GISCHE, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Citak v. Visitación-Lewis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 22, 2016
145 A.D.3d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Citak v. Visitación-Lewis

Case Details

Full title:In re Donald L. CITAK, et al., Petitioners, v. Hon. Laura…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 22, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
145 A.D.3d 602
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8612