From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citak v. Visitación-Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 22, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2804 77/16 5571

12-22-2016

In re Donald L. Citak, et al., Petitioners, v. Hon. Laura Visitación-Lewis, etc., Respondent.

Peter Wessel, New York, for petitioners. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jonathan D. Conley of counsel), for respondent.


Peter Wessel, New York, for petitioners.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jonathan D. Conley of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioners having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is granted to the extent of directing that the underlying matter be transferred randomly to another Justice, without costs or disbursements.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 22, 2016

DEPUTY CLERK


Summaries of

Citak v. Visitación-Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 22, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Citak v. Visitación-Lewis

Case Details

Full title:In re Donald L. Citak, et al., Petitioners, v. Hon. Laura…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 22, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)