From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cisson v. Middaugh

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Apr 26, 2009
9:09-CV-260 (FJS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2009)

Opinion

9:09-CV-260 (FJS/GHL).

April 26, 2009

JEROME CISSON 08-B-3744, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, New York, Plaintiff pro se.


ORDER


Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Jerome Cisson's amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 12. Plaintiff filed his amended complaint as of right pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that a party may amend his pleading "once as a matter of course . . . before being served with a responsive pleading." Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a).

In his amended complaint, Plaintiff alleges that, while incarcerated at Oneida County Correctional Facility, Defendants denied him access to the courts in violation of his constitutional rights. See Dkt. No. 12. The amended complaint is substantially similar in substance to Plaintiff's original complaint, albeit better organized. Plaintiff does not, however, include Oneida County as a Defendant. Therefore, the Court dismisses Oneida County as a defendant in this action. Furthermore, the Court accepts Plaintiff's amended complaint for filing.

In an abundance of caution in light of Plaintiff's pro se status, Magistrate Judge Lowe directed the Clerk of the Court to add Oneida County as a Defendant because Plaintiff had indicated in his original complaint that he held the Oneida County Sheriff's Department responsible for Defendant Hobbie's actions. See Dkt. No. 1 at 3. However, based on the allegations contained in the amended complaint, it is clear that Plaintiff did not intend to include Oneida County as a defendant.

Accordingly, the Court hereby

ORDERS that the amended complaint, see Dkt. No. 12, shall supersede and replace in toto the original complaint that Plaintiff filed in this action; and the Court further

ORDERS that Oneida County is DISMISSED as a defendant in this action; and the Court further

ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall issue summonses and forward them, along with copies of the amended complaint, to the United States Marshal for service on Defendants, together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk of the Court shall also forward a copy of the summons and amended complaint by mail to the Oneida County Attorney, together with a copy of this Order; and the Court further

ORDERS that Defendants or their counsel shall file a formal response to Plaintiff's amended complaint as provided for in Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cisson v. Middaugh

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Apr 26, 2009
9:09-CV-260 (FJS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Cisson v. Middaugh

Case Details

Full title:JEROME CISSON, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL MIDDAUGH, Sheriff, Oneida County; EDNA…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Apr 26, 2009

Citations

9:09-CV-260 (FJS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2009)