From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cisneros v. Wazhara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00829-CMA-CBS (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00829-CMA-CBS

01-08-2013

JASON CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER WAZHARA, Mountain View Police, OFFICER JANE DOE, and CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, CITY OF LAKESIDE, and JEFFERSON COUNTY, Jointly and Severally Defendants.


Judge Christine M. Arguello


ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING DECEMBER 10, 2012 RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the December 10, 2012 Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer that this civil action be dismissed without prejudice because of Plaintiff Jason Cisneros' failure to appear at the Status Conference held on December 10, 2012, failure to comply with the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and court orders, failure to serve Defendants, and failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. # 20.) The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 20 at 6-7.) Despite this advisement, no objections to Magistrate Judge Shaffer's Recommendation have been filed by either party. "In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate [judge's] report under any standard it deems appropriate." Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.").

The Court has reviewed the history of this case as well as the Recommendation. Based on this review, the Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Shaffer's analyses and recommendations are correct and that "there is no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Shaffer as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 20) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that this civil action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because of Plaintiff's failure to appear at the Status Conference held on December 10, 2012, failure to comply with the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and court orders, failure to serve Defendants, and failure to prosecute this action.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cisneros v. Wazhara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00829-CMA-CBS (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Cisneros v. Wazhara

Case Details

Full title:JASON CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER WAZHARA, Mountain View Police…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00829-CMA-CBS (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2013)