Cisneros v. Olmos

Full title: NORBERTO CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. OLMOS, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

1:11-cv-01639-LJO-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

NORBERTO CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. OLMOS, et al., Defendants. No. 1:11-cv-01639-LJO-BAM (PC) United States District Court, E.D. California. July 17, 2012

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A COURT ORDER (ECF NOC. 13, 15)

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Norberto Cisneros is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On June 15, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff did not file a timely objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 15, 2012, is adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's Motion for a Court Order, filed June 18, 2012, is DENIED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.