From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Aug 20, 2014
5:14-cv-03236-RMW-HRL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)

Opinion

          Krista M. Enns, WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

          SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Nicole Ryan, Attorneys for Defendant STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.


          STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE SCHEDULING

          RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. ("Defendant, " together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

         WHEREAS, on June 13, 2014, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendant in Santa Clara Superior Court;

         WHEREAS, on July 17, 2014, Defendant removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division;

         WHEREAS, on July 24, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike ("Motions") in response to the Complaint with an agreed-upon hearing date of September 19, 2014;

         WHEREAS, the Court entered the Parties' stipulation and proposed order extending the deadlines for the Oppositions and Replies;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to amend the complaint;

         WHEREAS, because Plaintiff is amending the complaint, it would be a waste of party and judicial resources for the parties to continue briefing and for the Court to hear the pending Motions;

         THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the Court should find that good cause exists to enter an order that:

         1. Defendant's Motions shall be withdrawn without prejudice and the Motions shall be taken off calendar;

         2. Plaintiff shall file its amended complaint no later than August 29, 2014;

         3. Plaintiff's amended complaint will not add any new parties or claims; and

         4. The Parties shall agree on an appropriate deadline for Defendant to file its motions or other pleadings in response to the amended complaint and an appropriate briefing schedule should Defendant file any motions in response to the amended complaint.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Aug 20, 2014
5:14-cv-03236-RMW-HRL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2014

Citations

5:14-cv-03236-RMW-HRL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)