From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Aug 14, 2014
14-cv-03236-RMW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014)

Opinion

          Sara B. Brody, Nicole M. Ryan, Ryan G. Fant, SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant, STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.

          WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Krista M. Enns, Attorneys for Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc.


          STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE

          RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

         WHEREAS, on June 13, 2014, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendant in Santa Clara Superior Court;

         WHEREAS, on July 17, 2014, Defendant removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division;

         WHEREAS, on July 24, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike ("Motions") in response to the Complaint with an agreed-upon hearing date of September 19, 2014;

         WHEREAS, under Civil L.R. 7-3, the due date for Plaintiff to file Oppositions to the Motions would be August 7, 2014, and the due date for Defendant to file Replies to the Oppositions would be August 14, 2014;

         WHEREAS, the parties agree that extending the deadlines for the Oppositions and Replies and setting the hearing date for September 19, 2014, would allow the parties to fully brief the issues and provide the Court with sufficient time to evaluate the pleadings prior to the hearing;

         THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the briefing schedule on Defendant's Motions, and the hearing on the Motions, will be as follows:

         

Plaintiff's Opposition Due August 18, 2014 Defendant's Reply in support of its Motions Due September 4, 2014 Hearing on Defendant's Motions September 19, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         The parties having agreed to the following deadlines and hearing date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the following briefing schedule and hearing date are set for Defendant's motion to dismiss and special motion to strike ("Motions") in response to Plaintiff's Complaint.

         

Plaintiff's Opposition Due August 18, 2014 Defendant's Reply in support of its Motions Due September 4, 2014 Hearing on Defendant's Motions September 19, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Aug 14, 2014
14-cv-03236-RMW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Aug 14, 2014

Citations

14-cv-03236-RMW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014)