From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cipollina v. Kent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 23, 1976
52 A.D.2d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

April 23, 1976


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 9, 1976, which, upon the cross motion of third-party defendant Russell in Action No. 1, which was joined in by third-party defendant St. Charles Hospital, dismissed the third-party complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion in the interest of justice, by adding the words "without prejudice" to the end of the decretal paragraph thereof. As so modified order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No fact findings were presented for review. In our opinion the third-party complaint states a valid cause of action for partial indemnification from the subsequent tort-feasors (see Musco v Conte, 22 A.D.2d 121). However, in view of the tardiness of the commencement of the third-party action and the resultant delay, confusion and prejudice it will engender in the main action, and those joined for trial therewith, it is the judgment of this court that the action should have been dismissed without prejudice pursuant to CPLR 1010 (see Henderson v Wein Hardware Co., 51 A.D.2d 696; Todd v Gull Contr. Co., 22 A.D.2d 904; see, also, Cipollina v Kent, 52 A.D.2d 632). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Margett, Rabin, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cipollina v. Kent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 23, 1976
52 A.D.2d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Cipollina v. Kent

Case Details

Full title:MILDRED CIPOLLINA, as Administratrix of the Estate of CARL R. MAXSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 23, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Vnuk v. City of Albany

" In the Court's view, the Part 1 Judge's severance of the belated third-party action was an entirely…

Soto v. CBS Corp.

The defendants appeal. " CPLR 1010 provides a safety valve for cases in which the third-party claim ‘will…