Opinion
Case No. 13-cv-12368
08-13-2014
Magistrate Judge David R. Grand
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [13], GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [11], AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [8]
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 13, R&R) to Grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 11) and Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8). At the conclusion of his report, the Magistrate Judge notified the parties that they were required to file any objections within 14 days of service, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2) and Local Rule 72.1(d), and that "[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal." (R&R at 18.) No party has filed timely objections. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the findings and conclusions of this Court. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985). It follows that the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 11) and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8).
SO ORDERED.
s/Laurie J. Michelson
LAURIE J. MICHELSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 13, 2014
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the attorneys and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on August 13, 2014.
s/Jane Johnson
Case Manager to
Honorable Laurie J. Michelson