From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Edmonds

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 15, 2014
100 A.3d 855 (Conn. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-15

STATE of Connecticut v. Michael EDMONDS.

Bradford Buchta, assistant public defender, and Nicole Donzello, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Bradford Buchta, assistant public defender, and Nicole Donzello, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 151 Conn.App. 763, 96 A.3d 607, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the record was not adequate for appellate review of the defendant's claim that he was seized when Sergeant Ronald Mercado commanded him to stop?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant was not seized until police officers conducted a patdown search of the defendant's person?”


Summaries of

State v. Edmonds

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 15, 2014
100 A.3d 855 (Conn. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Edmonds

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Michael EDMONDS.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

Citations

100 A.3d 855 (Conn. 2014)
314 Conn. 925

Citing Cases

State v. Edmonds

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following two issues: (1) “Did…

State v. Edmonds

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following two issues: (1) "Did…