From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cinnante v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 18, 1992
608 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-0439.

November 18, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Charles M. Greene, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We agree with appellant that, contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830, the judgment of contempt does not include "a recital of those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt," is based. Although a technical error, it requires a reversal and remand for correction of the judgment. Woods v. State, 600 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

LETTS, HERSEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cinnante v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 18, 1992
608 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Cinnante v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY CINNANTE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 18, 1992

Citations

608 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)