From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cindy M. v. Marisol M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 14, 2021
200 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14827 Dkt. No. O–10788–20 Case No. 2021–00899

12-14-2021

In the Matter of CINDY M., Petitioner-Appellant. v. MARISOL M., Respondent-Respondent.

Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.


Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.

Kern, J.P., Kennedy, Scarpulla, Mendez, Shulman, JJ.

Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered on or about March 2, 2021, which denied petitioner's family offense petition seeking an order of protection, on behalf of her child, Destiney M., against respondent, held in abeyance, the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved denied without prejudice to renew, and counsel directed to communicate with petitioner concerning the instant application for relief and advise that she has 60 days from the date of this order to file a pro se supplemental brief if she so chooses.

Counsel has not submitted a copy of any letter confirming that counsel has furnished petitioner with a copy of the brief filed with this Court and advised her that she has a right to file a pro se supplemental brief, in accordance with People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833, 384 N.Y.S.2d 161 (1976).


Summaries of

Cindy M. v. Marisol M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 14, 2021
200 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Cindy M. v. Marisol M.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CINDY M., Petitioner-Appellant. v. MARISOL M.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

200 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
200 A.D.3d 526