From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cincoski v. Richard

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Batesville Division
Jan 4, 2010
1:09-cv-00038 SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jan. 4, 2010)

Opinion

1:09-cv-00038 SWW-JJV.

January 4, 2010


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the parties' objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 25) is DENIED;
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 35) is DENIED;
3. Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 27) is DENIED;
4. Plaintiff's "Motion for Discovery" (Doc. No. 28) is DENIED as moot;
5. Plaintiff's "Motion for Jury Trial" (Doc. No. 41) and "Motion for a Hearing" (Doc. No. 36) shall be terminated. The Clerk of the Court is directed to note Plaintiff's jury trial request on the docket entries in this matter, and a pre-jury evidentiary hearing will be scheduled following the completion of service on all of the Defendants;
6. Plaintiff's Motion to Depose Defendant Richard (Doc. No. 42) is DENIED as premature. The Clerk of the Court is directed to once again prepare summons for this Defendant, to be served in care of the attorneys for Correctional Medical Services, and the United States Marshal is directed to serve a copy of Complaint (Doc. No. 2), the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 15), and this Order and summons on Defendant Richard, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore; and
7. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 42) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Cincoski v. Richard

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Batesville Division
Jan 4, 2010
1:09-cv-00038 SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jan. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Cincoski v. Richard

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL CINCOSKI ADC #143538 PLAINTIFF v. RICHARD, Dr., Grimes Unit…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Batesville Division

Date published: Jan 4, 2010

Citations

1:09-cv-00038 SWW-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jan. 4, 2010)

Citing Cases

In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.

2 WL 1455248, at *7 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2012) ("Since Plaintiffs' complaint does not include a procedural due…

Fatir v. Phelps

See, e.g., Peace and Freedom Party v. Bowen, 2012 WL 1455248, at *7 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2012) ("Since…