From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cincinnati Bell v. Ameritech Mobile Phone

Supreme Court of Delaware
Feb 11, 1997
692 A.2d 411 (Del. 1997)

Summary

affirming manslaughter conviction and stating that, in an appeal from a conviction following a bench trial, the judge sitting as the trier of fact is presumed to have reached the verdict based only on the admissible evidence before the court and to have disregarded that which is inadmissible

Summary of this case from Arbolay v. State

Opinion

No. 408,1996.

February 11, 1997.

Chancery CA 13389.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Cincinnati Bell v. Ameritech Mobile Phone

Supreme Court of Delaware
Feb 11, 1997
692 A.2d 411 (Del. 1997)

affirming manslaughter conviction and stating that, in an appeal from a conviction following a bench trial, the judge sitting as the trier of fact is presumed to have reached the verdict based only on the admissible evidence before the court and to have disregarded that which is inadmissible

Summary of this case from Arbolay v. State

regarding a partnership

Summary of this case from Kirksey v. Grohmann

declining to award of damages in suit alleging mismanagement

Summary of this case from Glick v. KF Pecksland LLC
Case details for

Cincinnati Bell v. Ameritech Mobile Phone

Case Details

Full title:Cincinnati Bell Cellular Systems Co. v. Ameritech Mobile Phone Service of…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Feb 11, 1997

Citations

692 A.2d 411 (Del. 1997)

Citing Cases

Kurzmann v. State

Thus, in order to obtain reversal on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct in this VOP hearing, Kurzmann…

Khandalavala v. Artsindia.com, LLC

"In the duty of care context with respect to corporate fiduciaries, gross negligence has been defined as a…