From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cimbler v. Brent

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 18, 2007
963 So. 2d 812 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 3D07-858.

August 1, 2007. Rehearing Denied September 18, 2007.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge.

Saul Cimbler, in proper person.

Heller and Chames and Jonathan Heller, Miami, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, WELLS, and SHEPHERD, JJ.


Appellant, Saul Cimbler, seeks review of a non-final order granting a motion to discharge a lis pendens. The primary purpose of appellant's lawsuit is to recover money damages and the action does not directly affect the title to or the right of possession of real property. We have held that in the absence of a duly recorded instrument where there is no "direct claim cognizable under the law against or upon the . . . property burdened by the lis pendens . . ., no lis pendens may be asserted under any conditions against the realty. . . ." Sunrise Point v. Foss, 373 So.2d 438, 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). See also Ness Racquet Club, LLC v. Renzi Holdings, Inc., 959 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Because of our decision, we do not reach the other grounds raised on appeal.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Cimbler v. Brent

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 18, 2007
963 So. 2d 812 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Cimbler v. Brent

Case Details

Full title:Saul CIMBLER, Appellant, v. Wes BRENT, etc., et al., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 18, 2007

Citations

963 So. 2d 812 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Cimbler v. Brent

Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). This appeal is nothing more than yet another attempt to place a lis pendens on…