From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cimarron Realty 100 Ltd. v. Horner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 1985
114 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 18, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.).


Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

Plaintiff seeks to recover a brokerage commission under an agreement which provided in pertinent part that "[t]he undersigned owner [defendants] hereby agrees to pay you or the Participating Selling Realtor a commission of 7% of the sales price in the event that the property or any portion thereof is sold or exchanged" (emphasis added). Thus, the agreement specifically provided for the commission to be paid only if the property was sold or exchanged, and not merely if the broker had obtained a prospective buyer. It is undisputed that the defendants never entered into a contract of sale with the prospective buyers produced by the plaintiff. Absent such a contract, the defendants' mere refusal to enter into one is not a fault or default of the seller such as would entitle the plaintiff to recover a commission (Graff v Billet, 64 N.Y.2d 899). Accordingly, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover a commission as a matter of law, and summary judgment should have been granted in favor of the defendants. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cimarron Realty 100 Ltd. v. Horner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 1985
114 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Cimarron Realty 100 Ltd. v. Horner

Case Details

Full title:CIMARRON REALTY 100 LTD., Doing Business as REALTY 100 BENTLY REALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Donald Yoo (New York) Corp. v. Tauber

The seller's only acknowledgment of an obligation to pay a commission was clearly conditioned, in its letter…

Casella v. Moczulski

It is undisputed that this did not occur. Thus, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing…