From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cillo v. Resjefal Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 19, 2002
300 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2420-2421

December 19, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Emanuelli, J.), entered March 11, 2002, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Emanuelli, J., with costs and disbursements. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered July 1, 2002, unanimously dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Appellant's motion to reargue and renew was properly deemed one to reargue only (see Pahl Equip. v. Kassis, 182 A.D.2d 22, 27), the denial of which is not appealable (see Zappel v. Port Authority, 285 A.D.2d 389, lv denied in part dismissed in part 80 N.Y.2d 1005).

Michael V. Sclafani, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Lisa M. Comeau, for defendant-appellant.

Before: WILLIAMS, P.J., NARDELLI, ELLERIN, RUBIN, MARLOW, JJ.


No opinion.

Order filed.


Summaries of

Cillo v. Resjefal Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 19, 2002
300 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Cillo v. Resjefal Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL S. CILLO, ETC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-respondents, v. RESJEFAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 727

Citing Cases

Brown v. New York City Bd. of Corr. (In re Soc. Serv. Emps. Union, Local 371)

Indeed, the court not only unequivocally “denied” the motion for reargument, but expressly ruled that it did…

Boorman v. City of New York

The contaminated meat had been butchered and processed by defendant Iowa Beef Processing, distributed by…