Opinion
Civil No. 12-3043 (JBS/AMD)
11-07-2012
VINCENT J. CIECKA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LANCE S. ROSEN, et al., Defendants.
HON. JEROME B. SIMANDLE
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiffs' motion to remand [Docket Item 4] and Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint [Docket Item 3]; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties in support thereof and opposition thereto; for the reasons stated in the Opinion of today's date; and for good cause shown;
IT IS this 5th day of November, 2012 hereby
ORDERED that the motion to remand is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss Counts I and II against all Defendants is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss Count III against Defendant Bleefeld and Defendant Moss in their individual capacities is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendant Bleefeld and Defendant Moss be terminated from the case as defendants; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss Count III against Defendant Rosen and Defendant law firm Rosen, Moss, Snyder & Bleefeld, LLP, is DENIED in part (to the extent Plaintiffs allege Defendants Rosen and the firm of Rosen, Moss, Snyder & Bleefeld, LLP allegedly tortiously interfered with Plaintiffs' prospective economic advantage) and is otherwise GRANTED in part.
______________________
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Chief U.S. District Judge