From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cicero v. Duncan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 30, 2005
No. 2:04-cv-2519-MCE-PAN-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2005)

Opinion

No. 2:04-cv-2519-MCE-PAN-P.

December 30, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 29, 2005, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 29, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Respondent's July 11, 2005, Motion to Dismiss is granted; Claim 3 is dismissed with prejudice as time-barred and Claims 1, 2 and 4 are dismissed as unexhausted.


Summaries of

Cicero v. Duncan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 30, 2005
No. 2:04-cv-2519-MCE-PAN-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2005)
Case details for

Cicero v. Duncan

Case Details

Full title:CASEY JOSEPH CICERO, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM DUNCAN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 30, 2005

Citations

No. 2:04-cv-2519-MCE-PAN-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2005)