From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ciccolini v. Vocafilm Corp. of America

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 6, 1930
253 N.Y. 588 (N.Y. 1930)

Opinion

Argued April 9, 1930

Decided May 6, 1930

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Joseph R. Margulies and Milton C. Weisman for appellant.

Sidney Handler and Jacob M. Mandelbaum for respondent.


The Appellate Division had authority to reverse the judgment as a matter of discretion. It did not exercise that power, however, but reversed as a matter of law. No error of law was involved. We are, therefore, compelled to reverse. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

CARDOZO, Ch. J. POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Ciccolini v. Vocafilm Corp. of America

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 6, 1930
253 N.Y. 588 (N.Y. 1930)
Case details for

Ciccolini v. Vocafilm Corp. of America

Case Details

Full title:GUIDO CICCOLINI, Appellant, v. VOCAFILM CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 6, 1930

Citations

253 N.Y. 588 (N.Y. 1930)
171 N.E. 794

Citing Cases

People v. Silver

( Dubuc v. Lazell, Dalley Co., 182 N.Y. 482; Cowenhoven v. Ball, 118 id. 231, 236.) And so it was held in…