Summary
recommending that the Court abstain from deciding the plaintiff's complaint, which challenged her state court conviction and revocation proceedings, based on the Younger abstention doctrine because the plaintiff was actively seeking relief in the state courts
Summary of this case from Pozoic v. Dauphin Cnty. Comm'rsOpinion
Civil Action No. 4:12-CV-2066
03-25-2013
JOAN M. CICCHIELLO, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. ROSINI, et. al., Defendants.
(Judge Brann)
(Magistrate Judge Carlson)
ORDER
In conformity with the memorandum issued on today's date,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. (Doc. No. 15)
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Probation is DENIED. (Doc. No. 10).
3. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. (Doc. Nos. 8 and 12).
4. The complaint is DISMISSED
5. The clerk is directed to close the case file.
________________
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge