From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cicchiello v. Lovett

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Jan 9, 2023
Civil Action 5:22-CV-255 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 9, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:22-CV-255

01-09-2023

JOAN CICCHIELLO, Petitioner, v. LOVETT, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOHN PRESTON BAILEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The above referenced case is before this Court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. 1] be denied and dismissed without prejudice.

This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert, denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 9] is ADOPTED, and Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. 1] is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Further, petitioner's Motion to Add Sentencing Transcript from Case 1:21-cr-100 as Exhibit to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Case 5:22-cv-255 [Doc. 10] and Motion to Consolidate Motion for Compassionate Release Reduction in Sentence BOP's First Step Act Elderly Provision with Case Number 5:22-cv-255 [Doc. 13] are DENIED AS MOOT. This Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to STRIKE this case from the active docket of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record and to mail a copy to the pro se petitioner.


Summaries of

Cicchiello v. Lovett

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Jan 9, 2023
Civil Action 5:22-CV-255 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Cicchiello v. Lovett

Case Details

Full title:JOAN CICCHIELLO, Petitioner, v. LOVETT, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Jan 9, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 5:22-CV-255 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 9, 2023)