From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cicatello v. Carlyle

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Dec 23, 2024
1:22-CV-61 (LAG) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 23, 2024)

Opinion

1:22-CV-61 (LAG)

12-23-2024

ANGELO CICATELLO, Plaintiff, v. UNIQUE CARLYLE, Defendant.


ORDER

LESLIE A. GARDNER, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Before the Court is the Parties' Amended Joint Motion for Dismissal of Action. (Doc. 64). Therein, the Parties represent that “[Plaintiff's claims against the [D]efendant and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company have been settled and released,” and request that the Court dismiss this action with prejudice. (Id. at 1). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), “an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cicatello v. Carlyle

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Dec 23, 2024
1:22-CV-61 (LAG) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Cicatello v. Carlyle

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO CICATELLO, Plaintiff, v. UNIQUE CARLYLE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Dec 23, 2024

Citations

1:22-CV-61 (LAG) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 23, 2024)