From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cibrian v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Dec 21, 2011
NO. 09-11-00288-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 09-11-00288-CR

12-21-2011

JOSE ANTONIO CIBRIAN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-08166


MEMORANDUM OPINION

In carrying out a plea bargain agreement, Jose Antonio Cibrian pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance, a state jail felony. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(b) (West 2010). The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Cibrian guilty, deferred further proceedings, placed Cibrian on community supervision for three years, and ordered that he pay a $500 fine. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to revoke requesting that the trial court revoke its decision placing Cibrian on unadjudicated community supervision. Cibrian pled "true" to one violation of his community supervision. The trial court found that Cibrian violated the condition of his community supervision, revoked Cibrian's unadjudicated community supervision, found Cibrian guilty of the offense of possession of a controlled substance, and assessed punishment at two years in state jail. Cibrian appealed.

On appeal, Cibrian's counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On September 8, 2011, we granted an extension of time for the appellant to file a pro se brief. Cibrian has not filed a response.

We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

We affirm the trial court's judgment.

Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

AFFIRMED.

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

_____________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice


Summaries of

Cibrian v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Dec 21, 2011
NO. 09-11-00288-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Cibrian v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANTONIO CIBRIAN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Dec 21, 2011

Citations

NO. 09-11-00288-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2011)