From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chyten v. Lawrence & Howell Investments

Supreme Court of California
Sep 22, 1994
34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 555 (Cal. 1994)

Opinion

No. S035450

9-22-1994

Kenneth Evan CHYTEN, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE & HOWELL INVESTMENTS et al., Appellants.


Kenneth Evan CHYTEN, Respondent,
v.
LAWRENCE & HOWELL INVESTMENTS et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of California,
In Bank.

Prior report: Cal.App., 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 459.

Pursuant to rule 29.4(c), California Rules of Court, the above-entitled review is DISMISSED and cause is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four.

The Reporter of Decisions is directed to publish the opinion in the above-entitled case in the Official Reports. See 976(d) and subdivision (c) of rule 978, California Rules of Court.

MOSK, KENNARD, BAXTER and WERDEGAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chyten v. Lawrence & Howell Investments

Supreme Court of California
Sep 22, 1994
34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 555 (Cal. 1994)
Case details for

Chyten v. Lawrence & Howell Investments

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth Evan CHYTEN, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE & HOWELL INVESTMENTS et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Sep 22, 1994

Citations

34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 555 (Cal. 1994)
882 P.2d 246

Citing Cases

Iriqui v. Latt

"A party on appeal cannot successfully complain because the trial court failed to do something which it was…