Opinion
24-10469
04-18-2024
Keith Chynoweth, Plaintiff, v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Defendant.
Elizabeth A. Stafford, Mag. Judge
ORDER STRIKING JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN [3]
JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge
The Court has reviewed the parties' joint Rule 26(f) discovery plan. (ECF No. 3.) The Court strikes that document for the following reason(s):
[ ] Missing statement of concurrence or the statement of concurrence does not comply with Local Rule 7.1(a). See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a).
[X] Wrong font size or improper formatting (e.g., single-spaced, improper margins, no page numbers, etc.). See E.D. Mich. LR 5.1(a)(2)-(3).
[ ] Over-length. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(3).
[ ] Brief missing required information (e.g., concise statement of issues, controlling or most appropriate authority). See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(2).
[ ] Exhibits do not comply with Rule 19(b) of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures (e.g., index, separate attachment for each exhibit). See E.D. Mich. LR 5.1(d)(1), 5.1.1(a).
[ ] Contains information that must be redacted (e.g., social security number, taxpayer identification number, birth date, minor's name, financial account number). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2.
[ ] Non-compliance with Local Rule 5.3 regarding filing an item under seal in a civil case. See E.D. Mich. LR 5.3.
[ ] Failure to comply with the discovery dispute protocol set forth in the Court's Practice Guidelines. See Judge Judith E. Levy, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/index.cfm?pageFunction=chambers &judgeid=44.
[ ] Other: ___.
The document (ECF No. 3) is STRICKEN and not part of the record. The document must be refiled in full compliance with the applicable rule(s) by Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
IT IS SO ORDERED.