From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chute v. Morrison Ctr.

Superior Court of Maine
Feb 3, 2017
SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-16-442 (Me. Super. Feb. 3, 2017)

Opinion

SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-16-442

02-03-2017

AMY L. CHUTE, Plaintiff v. MORRISON CENTER, Defendant


STATE OF MAINE
CUMBERLAND, ss ORDER

Plaintiff objects to defendant's request to produce plaintiff's medical records for the ten years prior to her termination and any post-termination records. Plaintiff is not required to produce her medical records, as she alleges incidental or "garden variety" emotional distress only. See (Pl.'s Compl. 6); Morrisette v. Kennebec Cnty., No. 01-01-B-S, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13309, at *3-4 (D. Me. Aug. 21, 2001). Plaintiff is precluded at trial from calling any medical experts on the issue of emotional distress and from offering into evidence records of treatment for emotional distress or the substance of any communications between plaintiff and mental health professionals or experts. See Sorenson v. H & R Block, Inc., 197 F.R.D. 199, 204 (D. Mass. 2000).

Defendant agreed to five years of records during the discovery conference. --------

The clerk is directed to incorporate this order into the docket by reference. Date: February 3, 2017

/s/_________

Nancy Mills

Justice, Superior Court


Summaries of

Chute v. Morrison Ctr.

Superior Court of Maine
Feb 3, 2017
SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-16-442 (Me. Super. Feb. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Chute v. Morrison Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:AMY L. CHUTE, Plaintiff v. MORRISON CENTER, Defendant

Court:Superior Court of Maine

Date published: Feb 3, 2017

Citations

SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-16-442 (Me. Super. Feb. 3, 2017)