From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Churchill v. Purkey

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 12, 2004
No. 02-04-241-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-04-241-CV

Delivered: November 12, 2004.

Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County.

Panel D: GARDNER, WALKER, and McCOY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On October 11, 2004, we notified appellants that their briefs have not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellants' briefs have not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Churchill v. Purkey

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 12, 2004
No. 02-04-241-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2004)
Case details for

Churchill v. Purkey

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY BRIAN CHURCHILL AND CHURCHILL MOTORS, Appellants v. MATT PURKEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Nov 12, 2004

Citations

No. 02-04-241-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2004)