From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Churchill v. Anderson

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 10, 2023
No. C23-1013-RSL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 10, 2023)

Opinion

C23-1013-RSL

07-10-2023

PANO CHURCHILL, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA ANDERSON, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

MICHELLE L. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Pano Churchill has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-entitled action. (Dkt. # 1.) Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $402.00 filing fee. Accordingly, Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP (dkt. # 1) is GRANTED. However, the Court recommends the complaint be reviewed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) before issuance of summons.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik.


Summaries of

Churchill v. Anderson

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 10, 2023
No. C23-1013-RSL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Churchill v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:PANO CHURCHILL, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA ANDERSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 10, 2023

Citations

No. C23-1013-RSL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 10, 2023)