Opinion
No. 2020-04791 Index No. 1114/19
02-01-2023
Xiu Jian Sun, suing herein as Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Servant: Xiu Jian Sun, Flushing, NY, appellant pro se. Vigorito, Barker, Patterson, Nichols & Porter, LLP, Garden City, NY (Adonaid C. Medina of counsel), for respondent Randy M. Pellew.
Xiu Jian Sun, suing herein as Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Servant: Xiu Jian Sun, Flushing, NY, appellant pro se.
Vigorito, Barker, Patterson, Nichols & Porter, LLP, Garden City, NY (Adonaid C. Medina of counsel), for respondent Randy M. Pellew.
BETSY BARROS, J.P. ROBERT J. MILLER JOSEPH A. ZAYAS LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Thomas Feinman, J.), dated March 3, 2020. The order granted the motion of the defendant Randy M. Pellew pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and, sua sponte, directed dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center.
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as, sua sponte, directed dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center is dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from a portion of an order that does not decide a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701[a]), and leave to appeal has not been granted; and it is further, ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further, ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant Randy M. Pellew.
"'In deciding a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory'" (Xiu Jian Sun v Lam, 143 A.D.3d 891, 892, quoting Fough v August Aichhorn Ctr. for Adolescent Residential Care, Inc., 139 A.D.3d 665, 666; see Leon v Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87-88).
In this case, the complaint does not set forth any legal theory, nor does it allege any facts in support of a legal theory against the defendant Randy M. Pellew (see CPLR 3013, 3014; Xiu Jian Sun v Lam, 143 A.D.3d at 892; Xiu Jian Sun v Dick Bailey Serv., Inc., 143 A.D.3d 891, 891). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted Pellew's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for failure to state a cause of action.
BARROS, J.P., MILLER, ZAYAS and WAN, JJ., concur.