Opinion
Case No. 09-11873 Adversary No. 09-00645
04-23-2012
In re: Daniel M. Lopez Debtor(s) Chunyen Chang and Michael Espy Plaintiff/Movant(s) v. Daniel M. Lopez Defendant/Respondent(s)
SO ORDERED
The Stipulation and Order of Dismissal (Stipulation) (Dkt. No. 96) is denied. The parties did not file a motion seeking the Court's approval of the Stipulation and the parties have not provided notice of the Stipulation as required by Fed. R. Bankr. Pro. 2002(a). Further, the parties have failed to provide either the terms of the Stipulation or good cause as to why it should be kept confidential. Finally, the Stipulation does not contain a certification of consent as required by Admin. Order 03-02.
______________________
ROBERT A. GORDON
U. S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION
Upon consideration of the Stipulation (Dkt. No. 96) filed by the Plaintiffs and Defendant, it is, by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland,
ORDERED, that the Stipulation is hereby denied.
cc: Debtor(s)
Debtor(s)' Counsel
Trustee
U.S. Trustee
All Other Parties Served with Vacated Order