From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chung v. PSRB Dir.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 2, 2014
Case No. 6:14 CV 00952-TC (D. Or. Sep. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 6:14 CV 00952-TC

09-02-2014

ANDY CHUNG, Plaintiff, v. PSRB DIRECTOR, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on July 28, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 2 day of September, 2014.

/s/_______

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Chung v. PSRB Dir.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 2, 2014
Case No. 6:14 CV 00952-TC (D. Or. Sep. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Chung v. PSRB Dir.

Case Details

Full title:ANDY CHUNG, Plaintiff, v. PSRB DIRECTOR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 2, 2014

Citations

Case No. 6:14 CV 00952-TC (D. Or. Sep. 2, 2014)