Opinion
22 Civ. 5635 (PAE)
07-07-2022
DUSTIN CHUDALLA, FRANK SAUMTY, JEFFREY EVANS, BILLY SCHAFF, and JERRY GOULD, Plaintiffs, v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTORING CO. et al., Defendants.
ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, DISTRICT JUDGE:
In light of Defendant 3M Company's (“3M”) representation that, “[f]ollowing removal, 3M intends to designate this action for transfer” to multi-district litigation in the District of South Carolina, Dkt. 1 at 6 n.l, counsel for plaintiffs and 3M are instructed to file a joint letter on the docket of this case, no later than July 11, 2022 at 5 p.m., indicating their views on whether the Court should hold an initial pretrial conference or instead await the outcome of 3M's anticipated motion to transfer.
SO ORDERED.