affirming bankruptcy court's settlement approval in part because appellants put forth no evidence contradicting the conclusions of others that the claim would not be successful, despite appellants having been involved in the litigation for three years
Summary of this case from Kim v. FieldNo. 94-55581.
April 10, 1997.
Appeal from the C.D.Cal.
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part.
affirming bankruptcy court's settlement approval in part because appellants put forth no evidence contradicting the conclusions of others that the claim would not be successful, despite appellants having been involved in the litigation for three years
Summary of this case from Kim v. FieldFull title:Chroma Lighting v. GTE Products Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Apr 10, 1997
Such a claim rests upon the existence of some specified contractual obligation and protects only express…
Spitzer v. AljoeCourts have been reluctant to find that court-appointed receivers are acting outside the scope of their…