From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 7, 2017
2016-2498 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 7, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2498

09-07-2017

CHRISTY, INC., Appellant v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC., STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC., Appellees

SCOTT R. ROWLAND, GableGotwals, Tulsa, OK, argued for appellant. Also represented by AMELIA A. FOGLEMAN, FRANK J. CATALANO, ALICIA EDWARDS, PAUL ROSSLER. BRYAN PATRICK COLLINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellees. Also represented by JACK S. BARUFKA, MICHAEL KARL HEINS.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-00468.

JUDGMENT

SCOTT R. ROWLAND, GableGotwals, Tulsa, OK, argued for appellant. Also represented by AMELIA A. FOGLEMAN, FRANK J. CATALANO, ALICIA EDWARDS, PAUL ROSSLER. BRYAN PATRICK COLLINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellees. Also represented by JACK S. BARUFKA, MICHAEL KARL HEINS. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 7, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 7, 2017
2016-2498 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Christy, Inc. v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTY, INC., Appellant v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC., STANLEY BLACK …

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 7, 2017

Citations

2016-2498 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 7, 2017)