From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christopulos v. Christopulos

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 2022
208 A.D.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

No. 2020-02288 Index No. 705015/14

08-24-2022

Gregory Christopulos, respondent, v. Katherine Christopulos, etc., et al., defendants, Nicholas Spyreas, appellant.

Nicholas Spyreas, Greenwich, Connecticut, appellant pro se. The Dweck Law Firm, LLP, New York, NY (Jack S. Dweck of counsel), for respondent.


Nicholas Spyreas, Greenwich, Connecticut, appellant pro se.

The Dweck Law Firm, LLP, New York, NY (Jack S. Dweck of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P. FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY SHERI S. ROMAN JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, for an accounting and to cancel a notice of mechanic's lien, the defendant Nicholas Spyreas appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Frederick D.R. Sampson, J.), dated January 15, 2020. The order denied, as academic, the motion of the defendant Nicholas Spyreas "to request Court to accept release and satisfaction of lien."

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied, as academic, the motion of the defendant Nicholas Spyreas "to request Court to accept release and satisfaction of lien," since it sought relief which had already been granted in a prior order of the same court entered September 30, 2019 (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714; see also Christopulos v Christopulos, _____ A.D.3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2021-06093; decided herewith]).

At this juncture, we decline the plaintiff's request to impose a sanction against Spyreas for prosecuting this allegedly frivolous appeal (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1). There are, however, more than a dozen additional appeals Spyreas has taken from papers in this action that are currently pending before this Court. Spyreas is therefore warned that future submissions to this Court that qualify as frivolous conduct may result in the imposition of sanctions against him pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (see Matter of Ram v Estate of Hershowitz, 149 A.D.3d 959, 960; Webb v Greater N.Y. Auto. Dealers Assn., Inc, 144 A.D.3d 1134, 1135).

DILLON, J.P., CONNOLLY, ROMAN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Christopulos v. Christopulos

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 2022
208 A.D.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Christopulos v. Christopulos

Case Details

Full title:Gregory Christopulos, respondent, v. Katherine Christopulos, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

208 A.D.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 5016
172 N.Y.S.3d 622

Citing Cases

Arnoux v. Glik

Finally, litigants who repeatedly make similar motions numerous times can cause unwarranted costs to their…